"Excellence" in writing

Lars Walker, a published author and someone I consider a friend, has been guest blogging over at Brandywine Books. I really enjoy reading his thoughts about writing because you get to see the awesome intellect and bedrock faith that he uses to create his alt-history and near-future Viking adventure fantasies.

One of the topics he broached was a post on Excellence in Writing. During that, I once again tripped over the concept of the "literary" novel versus the "commercial" novel. Frankly, I lost it and begged for a definition, which Lars was good enough to provide from his point of view. I quote his answer here:

"Good question, Darwin. My understanding is that a literary novel is one where the plot revolves around people's thinking, feelings and relationships, rather than physical danger and adventure (Romance novels excluded). Problems of society rate as literary subjects too. Also a literary novel emphasizes(theoretically) the evocative use of language, which is appreciated for its own sake, like poetry.

"I love Wodehouse's description of a Russian novel, which said (in paraphrase) that the main character did nothing for 300 pages, then shot himself. :-)"

Gah! Who'd want to read something like that? Actually, I suppose my question is, "Who'd want to be around someone who'd regularly read something like that?" Imagine enjoying what amounts to novel-length, obsessive whinging about the cruelty of life, the universe, and everything in artfully composed and ridiculously complicated prose. Just thinking about it makes me twitch.

I've heard rumours that the "Literary" intelligentsia look down their tenured noses at the kind of writing (SF&F). Haven't really experienced it yet, mind you, because those people not only bore me to tears but the bleeding heart, self-righteous, and inflexible politics of the universitat move me toward violence all too quickly, so I tend to avoid them when ever possible .

Ahem...

In any case, apparently having a compellling story-line with believable characters that the readers identify with doesn't fit into the "literary" definition. Yet, I can't accept any novel that doesn't take the reader into the story as "excellent", sorry. If I get bored, the book is finished and I hope it's the right thickness to prop up the short leg of my bandsaw. I don't care how insightful the friggin' author is about the plight of a Paraguayian chickadee, or how delicate his use of language in describing its habitat is. If I don't identify with the bird as a character, it's just a bird. Let's eat it.

Okay, okay. I'm abusing stereotype. Forgive me...not. I've got my paradigms just like anyone else. I don't buy literary novels because literary novels give me the yawns. I read for entertainment, to engage my imagination, and to play "what if?" If a literary work does that, then I'll read it. If it doesn't, it's just a small pile of processed dead tree held together by an egotistic elitist clique.

So, here's some check points for how I know when a book is excellent:

1. First and foremost, can I suspend my disbelief and care about what's going on?
2. Is the prose clear and concise?
3. Does the prose flow in such a manner that it requires little effort to read?
4. Does the author have the skill to use a minimum of description to evoke imagery rather than bludgeoning me with adjectives?
5. At the end, do I feel a wholeness in the story or do I just feel like there's something else that got forgotten?
6. When all is said and done, do I feel like pressing charges against the author and publisher for fraud?

Yeah, I could get more technical, but that's not where I'm going with this.

An excellent writer will craft an engrossing story without coming across as obtuse, whiny, or wordy. Prose isn't poetry, but an excellent writer will create prose that frequently feels poetic. The kicker is that they do it with a minimum of descriptor, by using language to tie into the common experiences of their readers to evoke imagery from within, rather than invoke it by using some prose mantra.

An excellent writer grabs the reader from the first paragraph and doesn't let them go until the story is done, for which the reader is truly grateful. It has precious little to do with "literary" qualifications.

Darwin